Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Staff Contacts | Home RSS
 
 
 
  1. I support it. I see no problem letting police or code enforcement issue citations based on citizen complaints.
  2. I’d like to see stricter enforcement but think the violation has to be heard by the police or code officer.
  3. I need more information.
  4. No.
  1. Yes, Cape Coral is not the place for private fireworks “shows” nor should individuals be shooting fireworks.
  2. I’d prefer to see more regulation and enforcement instead of a ban.
  3. Close the state waiver loophole. Nobody is buying small mortars and other flying or exploding devices to scare birds.
  4. No.
  1. Yes, the whole concept is wrong.
  2. Maybe some of them.
  3. I see the need, but conditions must be strictly monitored and stays must be short.
  4. No, they serve a purpose.
  5. Other.
  1. Great start. Looking forward to change in 2020.
  2. No surprises. I plan to follow the process.
  3. I agree with President Trump: Boring.
  4. I didn’t watch.
  5. I usually don’t follow the primary process this early; I wait until there are distinct frontrunners.
  6. Not interested. I vote Republican.
  1. Loved it. Looking forward to another win in 2020.
  2. Election season has begun for both sides. Strong kickoff and I like that he chose Florida for his first re-election rally.
  3. No surprises. Waiting to see who lines up on the other side.
  4. No. No second term.
  5. A second term? He shouldn’t be in office.
  1. Yes.
  2. Almost.
  3. We put our kit together with the first warning.
  4. We don’t “prepare,” we evacuate.
  5. We don’t do anything special.
  6. Other.
  1. Yes, Florida lawns need “weed and feed” to stay healthy and I like a nice yard.
  2. Yes, but not in the rainy season.
  3. Sometimes, if the lawn or landscaping needs a boost.
  4. On specific plants, like veggies or palms, if needed.
  5. I leave that decision to my lawn care professionals.
  6. Only natural or organic “fertilizers,” like compost or bone meal.
  7. No.
  8. Other.
  1. Attend a ceremony or visit the cemetery.
  2. We privately pause to mark our county’s military sacrifices, but don’t usually attend anything public.
  3. Barbecue with family or friends.
  4. Enjoy the three-day weekend.
  5. Nothing special; for me it’s another day.
  6. I work.
  7. Other.
  1. I think the city will benefit. It will foster economic development and pay for itself.
  2. I think it’s OK; cultural exchanges have value and I have no problem with the city taking part.
  3. I support the sister city/economic prospect concept but think China is the wrong choice.
  4. The trip? OK. How it was handled and approved? No.
  5. I see no value. Taxpayers should not be paying for this trip, period.
  6. I don’t see this as an issue, it’s only a $17,000 expenditure. It’s time to move on.
  7. Other.
  1. Good. I think they had their priorities straight.
  2. Mixed results but, the most part, good.
  3. Mixed results, not what I hoped for.
  4. Meh. Typical.
  5. Poor.
  1. Yes, recent measles outbreak show why.
  2. Maybe some of them, but not the entire battery.
  3. No.
  1. I think the investigation was comprehensive. I’m satisfied with the report and its findings.
  2. I’m satisfied, for the most part. Special Counsel Robert Mueller did an adequate job.
  3. The investigation left some questions. I think there are areas and issues for additional scrutiny.
  4. A witch hunt; a complete waste of time and money.
  5. It’s done. It’s over. It’s time to move on.
  6. Other.
  1. Yes.
  2. Maybe, if I were looking for something in particular.
  3. Probably not.
  4. No.
  1. Yes.
  2. No, keep it a secondary offense where you can get a ticket for texting but only if you are stopped for something else.
  3. I don’t think it should be an offense at all.
  1. Yes, for both.
  2. Yes, for streetlights.
  3. Yes, for sidewalks.
  4. Maybe. It depends on how much.
  5. Property owners getting a direct benefit should be the ones to pay.
  6. The city should re-prioritize existing funds for these capital improvements. Cut things not as important.
  7. No, these are ongoing budget items. The city is already addressing the need.
  8. Other.
  1. More money for defense, more for vets, $8.6 billion for the border wall and domestic spending cuts? What’s not to like?
  2. Good starting point; some things I like, some not so much.
  3. Typical mixed bag. About what I expected. Shrug.
  4. Cuts to education, Medicaid and Medicare, Social Security and environmental programs? What’s to like?
  5. Other.
  1. Yes, both.
  2. I’d like to see more commercial.
  3. I’d like to see more multi-family.
  4. Yes, more multi-family but we don’t need “affordable housing.”
  5. Maybe. It depends the project details.
  6. I like the Cape the way it is. Protecting the integrity of residential neighborhoods should be paramount.
  7. Other,
  1. An “A” - very transparent.
  2. A “B” - mostly transparent.
  3. A “C” - it’s government, it’s about average
  4. A “D” - Sub-par; the public gets too little information too late.
  5. An “F” - Not at all. It seems like everything is pretty much decided before the public gets to weigh in.
  1. It raised a lot of issues of concern that need to be pursued.
  2. Some interesting issues, some self-interest blathering.
  3. It was useless.
  4. I wasn’t interested and so didn’t follow it.
 
 
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web